Aspects of Connected Speech in British English Thesis

Aspects of Connected Speech in British English - Thesis Example 170). According to this school of thought, a new English speaker must master the weak forms in order to understand and communicate properly. If new speakers do not master the weak forms, according to this theory, the words will sound unintelligible and unfocused (Leanez & Waasaf, p. 170). The competing theory is that the mastery of weak forms is not necessary for adequate communication, but is, rather, only useful for perception (Leanez & Waasaf, p. 171). In other words, one can understand a foreign speaker who does not use weak forms, but the perception of that speaker is affected by this. Roach states that there are forty such words in the English language and, while it is possible for an individual to not use the weak form of any of the words, it is unadvisable to do so, because doing so makes the speaker sound unnatural (Roach, 1998, p. 102). Roach states that the second reason why an individual must learn the weak forms is because it aids in comprehension – since most speakers use these forms, it is necessary for the non-native speaker to learn them so that he or she can understand what she is hearing (Roach, 1998, p. 102). Roach also states that most of these forty words are function words – prepositions, conjunctions, auxiliary verbs and the like, and their weak forms are more prominent than their strong forms (Roach, 1998, p. 102). Examples of weak form words are the, a, and, but, that, than, his, her, your, him, her, he, she, we, you, them, us, at, for, from, of, to, as, some, there, can, shall, should, as, have, must, do, does (Roach, 1998, pp. 103-108). The weak form words may also be used in a strong form. According to Leanez and Waasaf, the accent, position and phonetic environment of the syllable determines if the syllable is going to be used in its weak or strong form (Leanez & Waasaf, p. 170). Some of Roach’s rules for discerning whether a

British Legal systems and Contract law Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words

British Legal systems and Contract law - Essay Example In the leading case of Olley v.Marlborourgh Court Hotel (1949) 1 KB 552, a lady deposited her fur cloak in the hotel locker which was subsequently stolen. She sued the hotel for loss of the cloak, but the hotel management pleaded that in the contract of service there was a specific disclaimer for liability arising out of theft. It transpired that the disclaimer notice was in the hotel room, and not at the reception where the contract was enforced between the lady and the hotel management. 1 Moreover she did not have constructive notice of this diclaimer when she booked her room. The Court held that the hotel was liable for the loss since, the claimant was not aware of the facts at the time of booking the contract. However, in this case, it is seen that Metalinque was aware of the material fact that the goods need to be shipped to Aberdeen, and not delivered at London office. The writer's opinion is that the seller, Metalinque cannot be absolved of liability in this case merely on the fact that their agreement was with the London office, and not with the Aberdeen plant since the purpose of the agreement was not fulfilled due to (1) delay in performance and (2) Subsequent losses to the buyer, arising out of breach of contractual obligation by the seller due to material variation in delivery terms Further if the law were to consider, the application of Section 4 and Section 4 (5) of the Supply of Goods and Services Act 1982, it is seen that there is an implied condition that the goods supplied should be fit and should serve the purpose for which it is sought. It is also seen that in the event that a party relies on the skill or judgment of another, whether the terms are expressly, or by implication, the implied condition shall be deemed to be present. In this case there is an implied condition that goods be delivered to Aberdeen. "Where, under a contract for the transfer of goods, the transferor transfers the property in goods in the course of a business and the transferee, expressly or by implication, makes know to the transferor, any particular purpose for which the goods are being acquired., there exists an implied condition that the goods shall meet such conditions." 2 (b) Even if there was a breach of contract, the sum sought is excessive. Under Section 20 (2) of the Sale of Goods Act 1979, the goods remain at the seller's risk until the title in them is vested on the buyer. When the buyer has accepted the goods at London, it is deemed that delivery has been affected. However, "where delivery has been delayed through the fault of either the buyer or seller, the goods are at risk of the party at fault, as regards any loss, which may not have occurred but for such fault." 3 In this case it is seen that, prima facie, there is a fault on the part of Metalinque for having caused losses due to belated delivery. However, this fault has been alleviated to a certain extent, due to the fact that Amethyst Ltd, had not explicitly and specifically stated under Clause 20 of the Purchase Contract that the goods need to be delivered at Aberdeen. In the absence of certainty of delivery of contractual obligation, they were at liberty to